| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
sfscolle Paid User Group Member

Joined: 22 Jun 2006 Posts: 4 Location: Hattiesburg, Mississippi
|
Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 9:38 am Post subject: Dealing accounts issue |
|
|
We have AFM setup to deal new accounts to collectors after 31 days on a "house" desk. There are usually a few days a month that no new accounts will be dealt simply because no accounts were entered 31 days prior to that day (usually due to a weekend when no accounts are being entered). Was wandering if anyone has a suggestion for a workaround to this issue, we would like to be able to even out the accounts so that some are dealt each day. We are using the WIP Sorting Defaults to try and control this but is there a way to do this with AFM? Thank you in advance for any advice.
John Jarrell
Southern Financial Systems, Inc. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dhenders Paid User Group Member

Joined: 14 Apr 2005 Posts: 28 Location: Bangor, PA
|
Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 12:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't know if you or anyone at your company can program but if so you could write a simple program that you can set in CFDAYEND-USER-BEGIN to run before the strategies are evaluated. The program would just have to select everyone assigned 31 days ago and if there is nothing then try 30 then 29 and so on until you have enough accounts. Once you have the account numbers you can update a specific fiscal field with a flag that a strategey event can then evaluate. So lets say you set FISCAL 999 to a 1 if you want it to be dealt, the event will wait until FISCAL 999 is a 1 and move on to the deal. _________________ David Hendershot
Creditech
Bangor, PA 18301
610-863-6025 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sfscolle Paid User Group Member

Joined: 22 Jun 2006 Posts: 4 Location: Hattiesburg, Mississippi
|
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 1:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thank you very much for your suggestion. I will definitely look into this process. _________________ John Jarrell
Southern Financial Systems, Inc. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rufinij Site Admin

Joined: 05 Dec 2004 Posts: 306 Location: Houston, TX
|
Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2010 6:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If what you describe is the exception and not the rule (i.e. it doesn't happen often), you could very easily select records at your discretion (from the house desk based on whatever you deem appropriate) and run them through REASSIGN which will use a reassignment strategy (I think the default - its been awhile).
If it is the rule, then a small program or paragraph/proc would solve the problem in the dayend as mentioned, as long as the criteria in your select provides consistent results day-to-day. _________________ John Rufini
Director - Technology
First Data - Merchant Services
Houston, Texas
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sfscolle Paid User Group Member

Joined: 22 Jun 2006 Posts: 4 Location: Hattiesburg, Mississippi
|
Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 8:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thank you all for the continued comments. This is very helpful, i am proficient with paragraphs but not so much with procs but i am learning. Thanks again for your response. _________________ John Jarrell
Southern Financial Systems, Inc. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|